Gotta Sink an Anchor

Gotta Sink an Anchor

This is an ongoing series of meditations on faith, in response to readings from the articles that preface The Oxford Study Bible.

I will trust the reader to dig up the context if the meaning is unclear.

Is this true? I had no idea that Judaism waited so long to canonize its scriptures.

In these first centuries of the common era both Judaism and Christianity gave shape to and defined the authority of collections of writings that formed their respective Bibles or canons of sacred writings (page 47).

The first centuries C.E. It's strange to think of Christians and Jews on a parallel track to found themselves, to make sure they wouldn't forget themselves in a shifting world.

People don't canonize for the heck of it; the fact that they took this step means they were facing some massive flux and uncertainty. It was a time when you could no longer trust your lived and spoken tradition to stabilize you. Too much was changing; you couldn't trust yourself to pass the right traditions to your children. You couldn't trust them, either. It was time to textualize: this book, this will tell us what is true and what we are.

What a sad time.

And yet, part of what they were doing, I'm doing too: "engaging the past in search of identity for the present and direction for the future."

Support me on Patreon, and get weekly art in your inbox – plus music, poetry, fiction & more. Pick your own level, starting $1/month.
Become a patron at Patreon!

2 Comments on “Gotta Sink an Anchor

  1. The canon of scripture did not ‘found’ or establish neither the Jewish nor the Christian religion. The Judeo-Christian tradition is founded on God’s divine revelation, which is recorded in scripture. But as a Catholic, I believe that Jesus Christ is the revealed Word of God made incarnate. And he gave authority to his apostles, whom he sent with the authority given to him by the Father. And it is from that God-given authority, that I can know that the Church’s teaching (including the canon of Scripture) can be trusted.

    After all, Jesus did walk on this earth, and he is who he says he is. It’s not just a nice heart-warming myth.

    I’d recommend you read ‘Jesus of Nazareth’ and ‘Introduction to Christianity’ by Benedict XVI. You may enjoy reading about it, and hopefully you will get a better sense of this divine revelation, the deposit of faith which the Church has guarded and continues to teach faithfully.

  2. Thanks, Leonardo. I’ll read those texts.

    I think you’re right, canonization didn’t found these religions in the sense of “create” or “establish.” Judaism and Christianity are a lot older than their canonization. When I said “they were on a track to found themselves,” I meant to formalize their identity, to stabilize it against the passage of time. Putting something into print solidifies a thing in a way nothing else does. Granted, the scriptures were already in print at that time, but before canonization, there was at least a continued discussion about which ones were authoritative: which were God’s divine revelation and which were not.

    About Jesus. To clarify, the last description I would ever give to the life of Christ is “just a nice heart-warming myth.” Jesus isn’t “just” anything, in my opinion. I do have questions about who he was and is, and I’m going to keep asking them, but I do so with love and respect, both for his person and for the faith.