If the Tao is the way, I don’t know that it’s the whole way. In the voice of his character Seymour, J. D. Salinger pointed out that religion hinges on detachment but poetry on passion, and if you want to practice the Tao you have to go beyond poetry — have to accept the bad verse alongside the good, which Seymour for one won’t do.
Anyway, I’ve been wondering. The Tao Te Ching gives many instructions on being soft, but says nothing on being hard. Isn’t there a time for everything?
And while detachment is positive and powerful, can’t passion be a positive force too? I know that passion is one of the most beautiful things, and there’s a time when embracing, flexing, ceding is destructive.
Does the Tao Te Ching account for this? Or is it willing to acknowledge only certain slices of what we humans are? It must be bigger than that.